Framegrab vs. still: a real world comparison

May 19th, 2008  |  Published in Home  |  5 Comments

Left, Canon 1D Mark II RAW, right, Canon XH A1 framegrab
Pixel to pixel: Left, Canon 1D Mark II, right, Canon XH A1.

Today I arrived at the Johnston County courthouse to cover a murder trial. The media was escorted up to a room overlooking the courtroom. The view of the witness stand was a good 60-foot throw from behind tinted glass. A small speaker with an 1/4 inch headphone jack offered some seriously overcooked audio.

I was doing double duty, stills and video. One problem, I forgot to bring big glass…

Even with my 1D Mark II at 1000 ISO, my exposure was something like a 60th at 2.8 with my 70-200mm. I was under-lensed and underexposed by a mile and 4 stops.

It turns out the framegrabs from my XH A1 video camera gave my under-lensed still camera a run for its money. Above is a pixel to pixel comparison of the A1 and the Mark II (shooting RAW). Both images are lightly toned in CS3.

Of course my comparison isn’t very scientific. There are too may variables in this situation, but I think it proves that framegrabs are a viable option in a pinch. If nothing else, it proves that my still cameras are old.

On another note: The second of the two videos I posted today was a raw video clip. This was the first raw clip I’ve ever posted to newsobserver.com. I thought the testimony was compelling enough to stand on it’s own. Set me straight fast if I suddenly turn into Howard Owens.


WARNING: Content contains graphic descriptions of abuse. Jessy Paddock, 20, alleges severe abuse during a hearing on whether a jury in Lynn Paddock’s murder trial should be allowed to hear evidence relating to her character and crimes for which she is not facing trial. Lynn Paddock is charged with first-degree suffocation murder of her 4-year-old adopted son, Sean. (Staff video by Travis Long)

Responses

  1. Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media » Tuesday squibs says:

    May 20th, 2008at 3:19 pm(#)

    [...] Framegrab vs. still: a real world comparison. A side-by-side comparison of shots from a Canon 1D Mark II and a Canon XH A1, in which the vidcam holds its own. [...]

  2. Guess which pictures are framegrabs | News Videographer says:

    May 26th, 2008at 5:46 am(#)

    [...] you’ve voted, hop over to Travis’s blog to find out the answer. Powered by Gregarious (42) Share [...]

  3. Das fliegende Auge says:

    May 27th, 2008at 12:04 am(#)

    Fotos aus Videos - Sinn oder Unsinn?…

    Travis Long hat den Versuch gemacht und zeigt anhand von Beispielfotos, dasssich  ordentliche Videokameras durchaus für Fotos (und damit für Print) eignen. Und so sieht es aus:   (welches Bild woher kommt, verrät Travis Long in seinem Bl…

  4. Bryan says:

    May 30th, 2008at 7:16 am(#)

    While the video still almost look better there’s still more detail in the shots from the Mark II (around the eyes mostly). I’d run them both through Noise Ninja and it would clean up a bit better ;) Not bad though from video.

  5. your next camera? « 2007-2008 photoj/doc class at ICP says:

    June 8th, 2008at 6:26 am(#)

    [...] from a Canon 1D Mark II and which is a frame grab from a Canon XH A1 video camera, check out his blog. Posted by bobsacha Filed in future, newspaper video, online journalism, photography, [...]

Leave a Response